Despite getting rejected the motion of censure, Netanyahu has begun to be the object of criticism not only from the political opposition, but also by the press and officers in the reserve that accused it of political errors which have led to Israel to international isolation, especially directed against the indecision of Netanyahu with regard to the formation of a Commission of inquiry. In addition, the Attorney general of Israel, Mija Lindenstraus, yesterday provoked great concern in the Government to announce that it intends to investigate the process of decision making that led to the collision of the freedom Flotilla, as well as the failure of clarification by Prime Minister Beniamin Netanyahu, policy and responsible for Defense and made it clear that he will arrive there where does not reach the Tirkle Commission(powered by Netanyahu to clarify the facts), but totally watered down, because in spite of having two international observers, they may not vote at the time that neither question the military that stormed the flotilla nor prompted resignations. Lindenstraus could therefore put them in trouble since you want to find out why the intelligence services not anticipated resistance from a group of activists aboard the Mavi Marmara (, the flagship of the fleet) and Netanyahu could be accused of political mistakes and lead Israel to international isolation, Recalling the case of Ehud Olmert who was accused of corruption and and finally forced his resignation. For more information see this site: James Woods. Case of being politically tossed Netanyahu, there would be time for the moral winner of the last elections Israelites: Tzipi Livni, leader of the Kadima party and currently leader of the opposition (the hidden trick of the Obama administration to definitely put the Israeli-Palestinian peace process), that would be willing to go a long way in the form of concessions in exchange for peace with Arab neighbors, but always with the condition sine-qua-non to ensure that the State of Israel is strong, self-sufficient and respected by the countries of the region. Under pressure from the Quartet for the Middle East, Hamas would proceed to the liberation of the Jewish soldier Gilad Shalit, (captive in the Strip since June 25, 2006) and on the other hand, Israel accede to relaxed the boycott of Gaza, not being disposable application by la ONU of Chapter VII of its Charter which establishes that When a zone or area falls under the control of a politico-military group (such as Hamas Islamic resistance), and when civilians are exposed or under fire because of military actions of that group, the ONU Security Council must intervene to ensure the protection of civilians and the establishment of the peace which has been alteredemulating past interventions of the ONU in areas like Bosnia and East Timor. With these premises and under pressure from the Quartet, Obama would be thus forced to personally participate in the negotiation process with the objective of establishing the bases for the establishment of the future Palestinian State (prior recognition of the State of Israel by Palestinian side) and that would conclude with the signing of a peace treaty between the new israeli Prime Minister and the new President of the Palestinian Authority (which would be the representative of the new Government of unity that It arose after the inevitable approach of Hamas and Fatah)..